Sunday, May 17, 2009

Some Thoughts on the Lost Art of Reading Aloud

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/16/opinion/16sat4.html?em

Excerpts -

But listening aloud, valuable as it is, isn’t the same as reading aloud. Both require a great deal of attention. Both are good ways to learn something important about the rhythms of language. But one of the most basic tests of comprehension is to ask someone to read aloud from a book. It reveals far more than whether the reader understands the words. It reveals how far into the words — and the pattern of the words — the reader really sees.

The words are not mere words. They are the breath and mind, perhaps even the soul, of the person who is reading.

You can easily make the argument that reading silently is an economic artifact, a sign of a new prosperity beginning in the early 19th century and a new cheapness in books. The same argument applies to listening to books on your iPhone. But what I would suggest is that our idea of reading is incomplete, impoverished, unless we are also taking the time to read aloud.

No comments: